Mendelian Randomization
Catalog entries using this tag (links open the entry card on its page):
Entries
Imaging Genomics Review
PUBMED_LINK
FULL NAME
Genetic analysis of imaging-derived phenotypes
DESCRIPTION
A comprehensive review of imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) for genetic analysis. Covers MRI, CT, X-ray, OCT, and other imaging modalities; traditional (FSL, FreeSurfer) and deep learning (U-Net, nnU-Net, self-supervised contrastive learning) pipelines for IDP extraction; biobank-scale cohorts (UK Biobank, All of Us); GWAS of brain, cardiac, retinal, abdominal, and skeletal IDPs; Mendelian randomization for causal inference linking organ structure to disease; and emerging challenges in multi-organ phenomics, longitudinal imaging, and clinical translation of IDP-based PRS.
URL
TITLE
Genetic analysis of imaging-derived phenotypes.
Main citation
Bian Y, Akey JM. (2026) Genetic analysis of imaging-derived phenotypes. Nature Reviews Genetics. doi:10.1038/s41576-026-00989-5. PMID 42409965
ABSTRACT
Imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) developed from medical imaging data, such as magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and X-ray scans, are traits that provide quantitative information on anatomical and functional properties of organs and tissues. IDPs are powerful tools for identifying biomarkers and studying disease mechanisms. When coupled with genetic data, IDPs can be analysed as heritable phenotypes using modern gene mapping methods to uncover genotype-phenotype relationships. The field of imaging genomics is rapidly maturing, with the emergence of high-quality imaging datasets collected in biobank-scale cohorts and sophisticated computational methods for extracting IDPs from imaging data, including tools that leverage machine learning. Here we review common imaging modalities and analytical approaches for developing IDPs, discuss biological insights gleaned from the large-scale genetic analysis of imaging traits and highlight emerging areas and remaining challenges that must be overcome to realize the full potential of IDPs for genetic analysis.
DOI
10.1038/s41576-026-00989-5
Diet-Inflammation-Insomnia MR
FULL NAME
Dietary Traits, Systemic Inflammatory Proxies, and Insomnia-Related Outcomes: Exploratory Mendelian Randomization and Population-Based Evidence
DESCRIPTION
High-dimensional Mendelian randomization screen of 231 dietary traits and 731 immune phenotypes for insomnia, with cross-release follow-up in FinnGen R12/R13 and population-based validation in NHANES and CHARLS. Prioritized omelette-related intake (protective, OR 0.77) and mixed-fruit (risk, OR 1.29) dietary signals, plus CD33- and HLA-DR-related immune traits. CRP associated with sleep problems in both NHANES and CHARLS. Exploratory cross-design analysis — does not establish causal mechanism.
URL
TITLE
Dietary Traits, Systemic Inflammatory Proxies, and Insomnia-Related Outcomes: Exploratory Mendelian Randomization and Population-Based Evidence.
Main citation
Zhou Y, Huang Y, Cao Y, Bi X. (2026) Dietary Traits, Systemic Inflammatory Proxies, and Insomnia-Related Outcomes: Exploratory Mendelian Randomization and Population-Based Evidence. medRxiv. doi:10.64898/2026.07.03.26357235
ABSTRACT
High-dimensional Mendelian randomization (MR) screens can prioritize candidate dietary and immune pathways for insomnia, but their interpretation is constrained by multiple testing, cross-dataset instability, and limited correspondence between genetic constructs and measured population variables. We conducted an exploratory cross-design analysis that combined MR screening of 231 dietary traits and 731 immune phenotypes, targeted cross-release genetic follow-up in FinnGen R12 and R13, and population-based analyses in NHANES and CHARLS. The targeted R13 follow-up prioritised an omelette-related dietary signal (OR 0.773, 95% CI 0.651-0.917), a mixed-fruit signal (OR 1.285, 95% CI 1.102-1.498), and CD33- and HLA-DR-related immune-cell traits. In NHANES, mapped omelet/scrambled-egg intake was associated with lower odds of sleep problems (OR 0.746, FDR=0.033) and doctor-reported sleep disorder (OR 0.313, FDR=0.008). Higher CRP was associated with sleep problems in NHANES (OR 1.192, FDR=0.001) and restless sleep in CHARLS (OR 1.097, FDR<0.001).
DOI
10.64898/2026.07.03.26357235